INSTRUCTIONS: Your answer should include all the major themes from this week’s lecture. Use the appropriate cover and references page. Provide at least two (2) reliable external sources and references to support your position or argument. Your paper should not contain more than 15% of external material. I use Turnitin (free for students as well) to check each paper for originality. If you need any clarification, please contact the instructor. ScenarioYou are a junior investigator in a newly established internal investigations department in Blue Arrow Technologies (BAT). Your supervisor came straight from a position at a law enforcement agency and does not really have your experience in internal, civil investigations. You are to assume that BAT is located where you currently reside.On your second day at work, you get a call from Human Resources. They say that John Schmoe, a regional sales manager, just left and is suspected of joining a direct competitor – Just Act Magnificently, Inc. (JAM). You then get a call from legal saying that that the sales department Director is exploring litigation against JAM for illegally taking John Schmoe and for possible loss of trade secrets. He indicates that he likely will be calling you again to help investigate other current employees, as well. You then report these calls to your supervisor.In an uneasy tone, he asks you to write him a research project, outlining the most general requirements and concerns in responding to these inquiries. He tells you to make any reasonable assumptions, as long as you indicate that your assumptions are supported by fact based resources (this is not an opinion project, suggestions have to be supported with resources). He doesn’t like to read too much, so he limits you five (5) pages, double-spaced – the page count does not include the cover or references page.Consider: Casey chapters 1 and 3 provide some great background; This is an initial assessment of what BAT might need to consider if they do end up in litigation; frame your key messages against that backdrop. Think about identification, collection, preservation (files, email, voice mail, text, printed copies, etc). When is litigation reasonably anticipated? The Sedona Conference Principles (the process for eDiscovery) – covered in Week 2, but consider reviewing some of the material for your paper. Do not write your project to your boss – write in a formal manner as if any member of the organization is going to read it; your boss is simply the person assigning the parameters of the project.Please make sure all work is original. I cant afford to have my assignments flagged by my instructor. But make sure that sources are credible. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO USE KEY POINTS FROM MY INSTRUCTORS LECTURE, WHICH I HAVE ATTACHED THE FILES TO THIS ORDER.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more