# NCU BTM8106-8 – Part I checks your understanding of key concepts from Jackson and Trochim & Donnelly.

August 31, 2017

Question
.gif”>

NCU BTM8106-8
NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY

ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET

Follow these procedures: If requested by your instructor, please include an assignment cover sheet. This will become the first page of your assignment. In addition, your assignment header should include your last name, first initial, course code, dash, and assignment number. This should be left justified, with the page number right justified. For example:

DoeJXXX0000-1 1

Save a copy of your assignments:You may need to re-submit an assignment at your instructor’s request. Make sure you save your files in accessible location.

Academic integrity:All work submitted in each course must be your own original work. This includes all assignments, exams, term papers, and other projects required by your instructor. Knowingly submitting another person’s work as your own, without properly citing the source of the work, is considered plagiarism. This will result in an unsatisfactory grade for the work submitted or for the entire course. It may also result in academic dismissal from the University.

BTM8106-8

Dr. Martin Crossland

Exploring Inferential Statistics and their Discontents

Assignment #2

Faculty Use Only

Part I
Part I checks your understanding of key concepts from Jackson and Trochim & Donnelly.

Answer the following questions:

1.Jackson even-numbered Chapter exercises (pp. 220-221; 273-275)

2.What are degrees of freedom? How are the calculated?

3.What do inferential statistics allow you to infer?

4.What is the General Linear Model (GLM)? Why does it matter?

5.Compare and contrast parametric and nonparametric statistics. Why and in what types of cases would you use one over the other?

6.Why is it important to pay attention to the assumptions of the statistical test? What are your options if your dependent variable scores are not normally distributed?

Part II
Part II introduces you to a debate in the field of education between those who support Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) and those who argue that NHST is poorly suited to most of the questions educators are interested in. Jackson (2012) and Trochim and Donnelly (2006) pretty much follow this model. Northcentral follows it. But, as the authors of the readings for Part II argue, using statistical analyses based on this model may yield very misleading results. You may or may not propose a study that uses alternative models of data analysis and presentation of findings (e.g., confidence intervals and effect sizes) or supplements NHST with another model. In any case, by learning about alternatives to NHST, you will better understand it and the culture of the field of education.

Answer the following questions:

1.What does p = .05 mean? What are some misconceptions about the meaning of p =.05? Why are they wrong? Should all research adhere to the p = .05 standard for significance? Why or why not?

2.Compare and contrast the concepts of effect size and statistical significance.

3.What is the difference between a statistically significant result and a clinically or “real world” significant result? Give examples of both.

4.What is NHST? Describe the assumptions of the model.

5.Describe and explain three criticisms of NHST.

6.Describe and explain two alternatives to NHST. What do their proponents consider to be their advantages?

7.Which type of analysis would best answer the research question you stated in Activity 1? Justify your answer.

References

Carver, R. P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(4), 287-292.

Chapter 5 – The importance of effect magnitude. (2005). In S. Davis (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of research methods in experimental psychology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishers.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.

Jackson, S. L. (2012). Research methods and statistics: a critical thinking approach. Belmont, CA Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Schmidt, F. (n.d). Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 233-242.

Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). The research methods knowledge base. Mason, OH Thomson Custom.

Attachments

Get a 30 % discount on an order above \$ 100
Use the following coupon code:
RESEARCH
Positive SSL