Ford Pinto Case Study

| July 29, 2018

Ford Pinto Case Study-see attachmentCompany Background:
The
Ford Motor Company was founded by Henry Ford, Alexander Y. Malcomsonhis, and
ten other smaller shareholders on June 16, 1903 in Dearborn, Michigan. In 1906 Henry Ford seized control of the
company. Ford became one of the top
automobile producers in the world with the development of the assembly line
process in manufacturing. This assembly
line process was put to good use with the introduction of the Model T
automobile in 1908 which was one of the most popular models of vehicles in the
world and was even internationally voted as the most influential vehicle of the
twentieth century. Ford rode the success
of the Model T until 1927 when they discontinued the model after selling more
than fifteen million units.
.jpg”>Ford Model T
Ford
was also the first auto maker to offer a higher pay for employees. The average pay rate for employees was $2.34
for nine hours of work, until Ford introduced a staggering $5.00 pay for eight
hours of work in 1914.
Beginning
in February 1942, Ford switched all of production efforts towards World War II
and withdrew from producing vehicles for civilians as ordered by President
Roosevelt. Ford began assembling jeeps
and putting the final touches on tanks, half-tracked armored personnel
carriers, armored cars, and other military vehicles destined for the war. Civilian production of vehicles did not
resume until July 1945.
The Ford Pinto:
Throughout the years Ford
has had many popular vehicle models and also had its fair share of
under-performing automobiles. One
particular model that has always had a lot of debate is the Pinto. The Pinto was Ford’s answer to European
subcompact cars such as the Volkswagen Beetle that had become popular during
the Middle East oil embargo in the 1970s.
The oil embargo was the response of the Organization of Arab Petroleum
Exporting Countries (OAPEC) to the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli
military during the Yom Kippur War. This
drove the price of gasoline through the roof and created a fuel shortage in the
United States making the need for a fuel efficient car important.
Ford began marketing the
Pinto in September of 1970 as a simple, rear-drive, fuel efficient subcompact
car. The purpose of the Pinto was that
it would get much better gas mileage than the average American sedan which was
popular at the time. Fuel costs were a
large factor in the market during this time period due to the embargo which
increased gas prices up to $0.50 a gallon.
The Pinto was a crude but durable car that was designed to satisfy the
demand for subcompacts in the U.S. market.
The Pinto sold very well in the early 1970’s and by the time the model
was discontinued in 1980 the Pinto had accrued over three million sales for
Ford.
The Pinto was going to be
Ford’s answer to the great U.S. demand for a durable, high gas mileage,
sub-compact car. The Pinto looked great
on paper with an estimated twenty to twenty-five miles per gallon highway fuel
economy. The 2,000 pound car debuted in
the early seventies with an asking price of around $1,850 which made it the
cheapest Ford model since the late 1950s. The Pinto sold very well throughout
the 1970s but did have some design flaws that proved fatal for some consumers
and ultimately for the Pinto itself.
Pinto Models and
Statistics
1971 Ford Pinto

Model

Weight (lbs.)

Price (new)

Number built

Sedan

1,949

$1,919

288,606

Runabout

1,933

$2,062

63,796

Total

352,402

1972 Ford Pinto

Sedan

2,061

$1,960

181,002

Runabout

2,099

$2,078

197,920

Station wagon

2,283

2,265

101,483

Total

480,405

1973 Ford Pinto

Sedan

2,115

$2,021

116,146

Runabout

2,145

$2,144

150,603

Station wagon

2,386

$2,343

217,763

Total

484,512

1974 Ford Pinto

Sedan

2,372

$2,527

132,061

Runabout

2,406

$2,676

174,754

Station wagon

2,386

$2,343

237,394

Total

544,209

1975 Ford Pinto

Model

Weight (lbs.)

Price (new)

Number built

Sedan

2,495

$2,769

64,081

Runabout

2,528

$2,984

68,919

Station wagon

2,692

$3,153

90,763

Total

223,763

1976 Ford Pinto

Pony MPG sedan

2,450

$2,895

MPG sedan

2,452

$3,025

Sedan V-6

2,590

$3,472

92,264 (all sedans)

Runabout MPG

2,482

$3,200

Runabout Squire MPG

2,518

$3,505

Runabout V-6

2,620

$3,647

Runabout Squire V-6

2,656

$3,952

68,919 (all Runabouts)

MPG Station wagon

2,635

$3,365

Squire MPG station wagon

2,672

$3,671

Station wagon V-6

2,773

$3,865

Squire station wagon V-6

2,810

$4,171

105,328 (all station wagons)

Total

266,511

1977 Ford Pinto

Pony sedan

2,313

$3,099

Sedan

2,376

$3,237

48,863 (all sedans)

Runabout

2,412

$3,353

74,237

Station wagon

2,576

$3,548

Squire station wagon

2,614

$3,891

79,449 (all station wagons)

Total

202,549*

1978 Ford Pinto

Pony sedan

2,321

$3,139

Sedan

2,400

$3,629

62,317 (all sedans)

Runabout

2,444

$3,744

74,313

Station wagon

2,579

$4,028

Squire station wagon

2,614

$4,343

52,569 (all station wagons)

Total

188,899

1979 Ford Pinto

Pony sedan

2,329

$3,434

Sedan

2,396

$3,939

75,789 (all sedans)

Runabout

2,442

$4,055

69,383

Pony station wagon

not available

$3,899

Station wagon

2,571

$4,338

Squire station wagon

2,607

$4,654

53,846 (all station wagons)

Total

199,018

1980 Ford Pinto

Model

Weight (lbs.)

Price (new)

Number built

Pony sedan

2,377

$4,117

Sedan

2,385

$4,605

84,053 (all sedans)

Runabout

2,426

$4,717

61,842

Pony station wagon

2,545

$4,627

Station wagon

2,553

$5,004

Squire station wagon

2,590

$5,320

39,159 (all station wagons)

Total

185,054

Ford Pinto Car Club Online
Problems with the Pinto:
The
Pinto began to see troubles with its design in the early 1970s when rear end
collisions with the lightweight car were causing the fuel tank to explode
causing the car along with its occupants to burn up. One flaw in the Pinto’s design was the
location of the fuel tank and the support structure that was used to protect
it. The Pinto’s fuel tank was located
behind the rear axle of the car instead of above the axle, like many other
vehicles. This was designed originally
to create more trunk space but ended up causing the fuel tank and the rear
bumper to be separated by only nine inches.
In the small amount of room between the tank and the bumper there were
also bolts positioned to where they could puncture the gas tank upon a rear end
collision causing fuel leakage. The fuel
line that ran into the tank was often disconnected from the tank in a collision
causing gas to spill out onto the ground resulting in fire and often an
explosion hazard.
.jpg”>Engineering.com
Research shows that the
engineers at Ford had knowledge of the design flaw in the testing stages of the
Pinto but did not make improvements to the car because it would have been very
costly and the original design was deemed legal by the federal court. Ford’s logic also stated that small cars were
inherently unsafe anyway so that was a risk the consumers were taking when
buying a sub-compact. The issue came up
again in the late 1970s when Ford was called out for a risk benefit analysis
they had performed on the Pinto. The
analysis stated that it would cost more for the company to change the design of
the Pinto to make it safer than it would to pay off the lawsuits of those who
were injured or killed in explosions caused by the unsafe Pinto. This rational caused an uproar and much
debate about the Pinto and the Ford Motor Company’s ethics and business
model.
Cost Analysis:
Modified Vehicles

Expected Unit Sales

12.5 Million

Modification costs per
unit

$11.00

Total Cost to produce vehicles without fire hazard

$137.5 million

Lawsuits Paid

Expected Accident
Results (assuming 2100 accidents)

Burn Deaths

180

Serious Burn Injuries

180

Unit costs of accident
results (assuming out of court settlement)

Burn Deaths

$200,000

Serious Injuries

$67,000

Burned Out Vehicles

$700

Total Costs to Settle Lawsuits

$49.5 million

Leggett

Case Study Questions:
1.
Please identify and explain three different issues Ford Motor Company is
facing in this case.

2.
As a consultant, please explain how Ford Motor Company could have
avoided the problems they faced with the Pinto?

3.
Discuss the ethical issues that arose from Ford’s stance concerning the
safety of the Pinto.

4.
Please perform a SWOT analysis on Ford during the time of this incident.

5.
Identify three changes that you would have suggested as an OD consultant
to Ford during, or after production of the Pinto. Explain how would you implement these
changes?

6.
Analyze the cost/benefit analysis Ford used in their decision making
process concerning the safety of the Pinto.
Discuss your argument in favor or against Ford’s decision. Make sure you evaluate both sides of the
argument when discussing.

7.
What is the most important thing Ford must consider for the future?

None Case Questions:
8.
What is the difference between an internal and an external consultant?

9.
Why are organizations resistant to change?

10.
What is the most important element you have learned in this class so
far?

Get a 20 % discount on an order above $ 40
Use the following coupon code:
LOBSTER
Positive SSL